Overview
RECs is Xceptor’s reconciliation product — one of three pillars I design across, alongside Dataset and Post-Trade. Reconciliation teams work through high volumes of transaction matches every day; RECs introduces AI-generated match recommendations into that workflow to speed the process up. My job was to make sure that speed didn’t come at the cost of trust: users needed a fast, legible way to review, question and act on what the model suggested.
The problem
Manual reconciliation is repetitive and fatigue-prone — the more matches a person reviews in a row, the easier it is to miss the one that’s wrong. Adding AI recommendations to the workflow solves the speed problem, but introduces a trust problem: if users can’t tell why the model suggested a match, they either rubber-stamp it (risky) or double-check everything anyway (defeats the point).
[Baseline metrics — e.g. average time per reconciliation task, error rate before AI assistance — to be added from product analytics.]Process
I partnered closely with the Head of UX, Product Owners, PMs and engineers through each stage of the initiative:
Accessibility was a constraint throughout rather than a pass at the end: RECs sits on Xceptor’s micro-frontend design system, which I contribute to and which is assessed against WCAG 2.2.
What shipped
The result is a recommendation workflow that lets analysts move through matches quickly while still being able to see, at a glance, why the AI suggested what it did — so a “yes” is a confident yes, not a shrug.
Outcome
RECs now helps users complete reconciliation tasks faster and make more confident decisions on AI-generated recommendations.
[Outcome metrics — e.g. % reduction in average handling time, AI-recommendation acceptance rate, error-rate change — to be added once available.]CEO Recognition — 2025
AI-Enabled Reconciliation Workflow Design, Xceptor